Power Akku oder Standard Akku? Der Vergleich! Welcher Hersteller hat das beste System? Mit Verlosung

Welcome to Gotools.tv
My name is Sebastian and today we are testing batteries at the limit. The battery systems of the various manufacturers here in the border area in connection with the devices. Because how strong is the new POWERSTACK system from DeWalt really? How much power does it have at the absolute limit? What about the Milwaukee High Output batteries? Are they any good or not? Or is the best system maybe even Makita 40 volts? Or is it ProCore or or or And I'll tell you 1600 holes! and the result will knock your socks off.

Of course there can be something again today, namely a 250 € shopping voucher. Just write below in the comments. What do you think, who wins? And when you found out, would you have thought that? So today 1600 holes in this video. And I'll tell you one thing. It really, really took a lot of strength, because drilling 1600 holes with these devices. Keep going and not a bit of a hole, we're talking about a 54 millimeter Forstner drill with a self-cut centering tip. I'll get back to you in a moment. Yeah, I'm telling you, we were really, really exhausted and glad to have it done. Because we did the following. We recently made a video on the topic of power stacks. On the one hand, we used the normal five power stack , a normal five Ah. taken and the power stack and just screwed screws. And it was the case that with the same screw size and the same cordless screwdriver with the new normal five amps I only managed half as much as with the 5 power stack That means if I no longer had a 5 Ah power stack The energy in both was the same, but both were empty afterwards.

But he did twice as many screws and I was like, what's going on now? I would like to know. How's that for everyone? But I was looking for an application that was really at the limit and at the limit of a cordless screwdriver, our rechargeable battery and such a rechargeable battery. Of course it's a question. And then we thought well , screws, screws, screws, lots of screws, screws. They are not really stressed, not as stressed as it really is at the maximum. At first we considered, maybe sawing a hole, maybe not big, long screws, but that's all quite difficult. Milling drill but also another idea.

But in the end we came to this, namely Forstner Bohrer. With this project, it's just that we're doing the far ahead, although that's actually irrelevant. We have a self-tapping tip here. That's very, very important. There are normal Forstner, they only have a small little tip here, but they don't have a thread. It's like that, you decide how much you come from this material, you push it a little more and that's no problem, with a little more rest, then it goes a little more forward. It's always the same with those here. That means that as soon as it comes into contact with wood, it pulls itself towards it with this, with this cutting edge and point, i.e. with the thread, yes, so to speak. You push yourself and then you push this entire surface that we have down into the wood, which puts an enormous strain on the equipment because the equipment has to do it. They need a lot of strength. Boom, as I always say, to then turn it in and then the following happens.

You need a lot of energy, which you have to draw out of the battery here and the device itself has to implement the whole thing up here in the motor and also has to work properly here. And what do we get out of this? First of all, the batteries overheat because they need so much energy and because they draw so much energy and overheat. How do you do it? But we also see whether the engine is efficient here and converts the energy and how good the cooling is here. These are all things we can figure out. And we tested that with exactly these devices. And I tell you, the result still confuses me. Which devices did you actually use to test? And actually with one exception and that is extremely important. If we look at it later, we have the well-known Allstars here, namely the strongest in their class. We have the DeWalt DCD999 here, we have the M18FDD2 here from Milwaukee.

Here from Makita we have the HP001G in the 40 volt range, 18 volts, we have the DHP 486 Metabo, we have the SB18LTXBLI and we have the GSR 18V-150 C from Bosch another device and the DCD800 not as strong as the others, but we absolutely need it. We now have seven devices and a lot of technical data. They don't fit on the monitor at all or hardly fit at all. Here's a sheet of paper.

You don't get younger with new glasses. No, joking aside, we have so much data here, but we don't really need it for the test. Here we have the most powerful devices in their class, each with, for example, 150 Newton meters or 140 Newton meters or 127 or 135, i.e. everything well over 100 meters with one exception, namely the DCD800, which has 90 in the hard case and 90 in the soft case Case 27, so he's not nearly as strong, but on the contrary actually the weakest of all. Still surprised afterwards. If you want all the tech specs that I have here as well then as always you can find them on Gotools in the tool comparison or doesn't it even sound like it up here? And then please do the following After watching the video, please decide on the page.

What do you think is the best overall package. I'd be very interested in that. But then we finally come to the topic of testing. We thought well, let's test it now and first of all we took the following, and not in the DCD800, but took exactly this test field here and said we want to test all the batteries from the different manufacturers. So we wanted to test battery systems, but we also wanted to have the same values ​​as possible.

Ergo, we always wanted to have five ampere hour batteries. That's why I took exactly the ones we have on the table. For example, I took a STANDARD battery from Bosch, here five amps , and the 5.5 amp Procore as a system at Procore. Maybe it's best we talk about it now. The Procore is the more modern system from Bosch, also has the more modern cells in it, but still round cells in here. And the processor does one thing very, very well, namely it conducts the heat to the outside, ergo in the border area.

If we see whether it's getting hot or not, who will tell you right away, then we have the HD batteries here from Metabo here five ampere hours. I haven't found anyone else. Without HD, the solo has to do it, or only this one has to do it here. That's the STANDARD at Makita. 18 volt batteries have always felt like the same system for centuries. You all know that there are 5, 6 amps or even smaller 3s? But of course 5 series with a total of 90 watt hours. That's important, because we calculate everything right down to the 90 watt hours here. This one here, for example, has 99 watt hours, but in the test results we divided or multiplied it accordingly by five times five times five. In this case, again, so that we all measure the same as if they only had 5 amperes in them, i.e. had saved a few hours. So, then we have 40 volt Makita here, theoretically a 36 volt system. Measured differently, 40 volts here are two 18 volt batteries in one block. Theoretically. Here we are switched, but we have a total of 180 watt hours here.

That means we halved the test results because we wanted to know with the five hours, what do we get out of five amps, what is which system, how efficient and in the limit area. Well, then we have two different systems here at Milwaukee, namely the normal five STANDARD and the high output exactly 5.5. That also the more modern newer system where you also have the newer cells in it and let's not talk about any specials. But the newer cells are in here, also resting cells that are on duty here. But that's already a lot bigger and you need to build a lot more here to accommodate that. And then in the end we also took the normal STANDARD 5 Ah from DeWatlt and then here the power stack with a completely new technology. You don't have round cells, you have flat cells in here that are stacked on top of each other.

We want to know what works best? And do I get overheated? And now the misery really started , because we have this phase, where we took, but that's a 41 millimeter drill also with the centered on it. But we noticed the following with all the drilling: we drilled 850 holes. Did we find out that was a stupid idea? That was stupid. Well, it can happen, but it doesn't have to be established. We didn't notice any significant differences, because from 61 in the worst to 55 in the worst to about 80 holes it was relatively identical.

But 60, 65, 72? And so forth. Nonsense yes, not a real burden. We also have the batteries, the devices and so what then? Measured accordingly and hardly saw a difference. And then we said okay, let's test it with this one, with the 54 millimeter. And then our problem started a bit, namely we did it first with the DCD999 and had interesting test results there, namely with the 999. Was it the case that the number of holes didn't correspond to what we had talked to some manufacturers here about what the manufacturers suspected, what would come out, namely here with the 999 it was the case that we only. Did 75 holes with this drill and said yes at the time, the difference is that the device, DCD999, is not that efficient and I'm very interested in that is not that efficient because it's the older device. It's also brushless, everyone here is brushless, it's an older device but doesn't use the energy as well.

The electronics aren't as modern as in the 800, and you said you'd better try the 800. It's even more efficient. That would get you even more holes. Because here again and we'll make a table for the one where we have the test in it. But you just made it. only 74.5 holes. We're going to rule it out now. Hint from the picture Take the eight hundred. And I'll say that right away. Actually, we wouldn't have taken it and normally I wouldn't have taken it because there isn't a handle anymore. Okay, we'll try it anyway and do the test and have now tested both here. And we're going to do the following We're going to show you a small table up here, we'll do it like this, there'll be two tables, one with the STANDARD battery system.

With the basic battery system, I'll say once and once below and once above with the power battery, then let's see, it's always a bit like that. Which one is there in first place and second place? It's best if we leave a little space up there again. Now with the picture it's like that with the normal five hours, we also drilled, drilled, drilled and drilled and got something out of it. We did 46 holes. HM okay. But it's interesting that we didn't have 50, 60, 70, 80 with the power stack. We managed 90 holes with the power stack. 90, 90 more holes. So that means we really couldn't do it here with the battery. And the interesting thing is, this is the only battery that deals that has overheated. The battery got so hot, so close to the limit, that it only got 46 because it really got that hot. Now here, it still has two bars, which means it's probably a little more than half full.

It got hot and we wanted to drill through screws in one, i.e. drill through the inside. And we really only have 46 holes here. After that the thing was so hot, it was already 60 degrees on the outside, which means it must have been even hotter on the inside, 60 degrees on the inside, on the outside, so inside it was 70, 80, 90 degrees in doubt. And then he simply switched off for technical reasons. end after. Of course that doesn't exist like that, it's really about working at the limit and he just gave up. With this one we've got 800s there, we've made it , 90 and that's enormous. But you also have to say that the device wasn't really intended for this, because the cooling is so small here, but it got really hot , afterwards it had a temperature of Hold on tight of 66 degrees.

So back here we have 66 degrees. It's tidy. We'll easily top that, you'll see in a moment, but 64 degrees. I was so through. We also abused it a bit, because we held it that way, but one opening was also closed because we didn't have any tools like that , somehow we had to try to drill the holes here. Difficult. Let's get to the result ultra crass. We took the normal fiver first, this one. And with that, we've tightened the screw. But actually not the way you screw, because it is completely empty. You see empty, empty, empty here. And that was really, really the end. We hadn't made it. At the same time, the device got quite warm , he said okay, and then we did another test in the morning so that we could let this one cool down again.

Then we were at room temperature again, then we measured the high output, this one. And with that we drilled a relaxed 80 holes, converted from 5.5 to 85 holes . But and I don't have to do it, the device was 95 degrees hot here at the back, 95 degrees, so especially here in the back area it was 95 degrees according to the number of holes, but it made it and is of course already up here in the ranking doing quite well with 80 holes, but that's tough. So you don't want to keep that anymore and with that we come to the next one. Let's get to Makita. Let's start with the simple ecosystem . Here and there we also had to use two different devices, on the one hand the DHP486 and. Or the HP001, here 40 volts, here 18 volts.

The following came out with the 18 volt Makita Here we have 56.5 holes in STANDARD operation 56.5 holes. It went through well, feels good, does its job to say the least, just drilled, drilled, everything relaxed and is therefore also quite good in the ranking. But here in the high output area, the output is more or less in the old system. In the new topic 40 volts we drilled 170 holes. But that means we had to, because we wanted to get the 90 watt hours, so five amps at 18 volts , you have to halve that to 85, so we made 85 holes here. The following is interesting, that the device was one of the two best devices in terms of handling, because the handle is nice and long , the device has a lot of power and you can work relaxed here. The overall handling is actually quite good if you look at the hand like that. That's really good, even if you have to say that it's really difficult.

Okay, I used to have holes with it, so let's skip it and get to Bosch first. At Bosch, we used five amperes all the time. STANDARD basis and with that we made it, um 70…68.5. So we rest like we did each other. 69 holes, 69 holes with the STANDARD battery and the device. That was a whole lot of holes in those. I did the test myself. Was it that we here. Converted to 5.5, we did 83 holes, so that means 70 to 83 is not a huge difference. And there I drilled and drilled again. And as you can see in the video, I stopped from time to time, because with the crowd it's so that her arm gets lame. So we worked here for days, days, weeks. We even drilled and drilled, drilled, drilled here for weeks. Well, then we did it. Or rather, I did the following. I also compared them all again for myself. And here it was also the case that the hand grip was extremely good and lay extremely well. And the ones with the Makita were the only ones that still felt solid and nice to hold, even after a long, long drill .

And everyone else was always told that it could actually be the end of it now, because it's always exhausting to hold on to. Okay, so that means here we have 83 holes and here are the tables up here from the power batteries and the newer, more modern batteries and here from the basic batteries and now comes Metabo. Here it is, oh nonsense but all nonsense Metabo did the following with the HD battery that we did here Metabo managed 96 holes five, but converted to five hours it was 96 holes.

Also here drilled, drilled, drilled and a total of 96! Insanity! I told you earlier at the DeWalt how hot the battery got, it was 61 degrees. I can pass it on later, as it was with the others. At Milwaukee it was a relaxed 35 degrees after all that, in both systems. At Makita, for example, it was 56 degrees here, which is already at the limit. But here it was already 43 degrees, sometimes 42 was really not thought of at Metabo 37 degrees Well, you can, you can do it that way. At Bosch, both systems were close to 40 degrees. Whatever that was. You always think that it's actually not a bad thing if the battery is hot on the outside. Shouldn't one be hot? Of course I don't know. But it doesn't matter how warm the batteries are.

That's just an indication of what's going on. At Bosch, for example, the Procore is really built in such a way that it always releases any extra heat to the outside immediately, so that it gets hot on the outside and not so warm on the inside. Of course, this is not the case with older basic batteries like here at Makita. So ergo it's just that the batteries didn't get as warm overall during the test as we would have thought, although we weren't in the limit area. But the devices, I mean the far here, I really don't know about the battery, why did it go so fast? Whether it really always said end, exclusion or I really have no idea at all. At DeWalt it dropped out because of the heat and so on and so forth. But what we noticed is the following. The overall system that we have here from Metabo, where the cordless screwdriver plus the battery is simply the most efficient. That means it will probably be like this if we screwed screws in the limit area.

In the limit area, I would also work the longest if we just made STANDARD screws. So simple screws like what I do six 80 or like we did at DeWalt would be really interesting again. But we're probably talking about 5 to 6,7000 screws that we have to screw. Let's say it again. please say no Write in the comments. No, we shouldn't do it. Don't repeat the whole thing with screws. No, no, but we'll really see again I have it here on the note. You have shown here that in the STANDARD basic battery area, Bosch was the one who did the most with 70, then Makita came far into the area of ​​the more modern batteries, where efficiency is simply not what counts. The fact is that Metabo comes with 96 or DeWalt, Makita, Bosch and then Milwaukee. But there isn't usually that much of a difference, except here at who, at who, so in the range , except for Milwaukee. It's amazing how big the difference is to the other manufacturers. I hope I can help you a bit, also with the selection or with your thoughts on the different battery systems.

Because the question keeps coming up: What is the best best ecosystem? And of course this is only one possible test and this is only a really borderline test, because I can't test the devices themselves, the individual devices, but the batteries individually, I have to test it together with the cordless screwdriver. And then it's always the case that I test the entire system. If now, and by the way, that's exactly the point with this one , we were simply less efficient with this one and also made fewer holes here.

And if we also have a much older device here in other cordless screwdrivers, a non-brushless device, if we don't get that number by far. So you always have to put things in perspective for yourself and evaluate them again for yourself. Please go to the comparison page on Gotools.de and say who won from your point of view? What does that say is the best overall system? Is it maybe Makita or Bosch in the end? Because maybe they can do a few less, they're not quite as efficient, but you can do them much more easily Who knows what your preference is? I would be very interested and I look forward to your comments. That will certainly be controversial. And now it's time to get to the tool and see you next time, and I'm now thinking of the next test..

As found on YouTube